AI governance
37 states with published statewide guidance. Mean implementation signal 3.56. 0 classification or score changes from June to August.
Deep research, policy scans, and implementation studies. Less hot take, more receipts.
Nine research signals, kept separate on purpose. There is no blended score. Open enrollment is four policies, not one heat map.
| Family | Status | As-of | Source |
|---|
Tile color shows the device-policy model. The number is the AI implementation signal score, not a legal ranking. NR means that jurisdiction was outside the underlying 50-state AI study. Microschool pathway labels are not legal clearance. Directory counts and NFHS esports survey values are visibility measures, never statewide censuses. Open enrollment missing cells are not yet verified, never zero and never “no program.”
Read the AI governance studyRead the elementary device studyRead the microschools studyRead the K-12 esports studyRead the K-12 cybersecurity studyRead the teacher-pipeline studyRead the voucher fiscal studyRead the interoperability studyRead the open enrollment study
3 official monthly snapshots from June to August 2026. AI status, AI scores, and device-policy models are unchanged across the 50 states. What changed is coverage: later months added microschools, esports, cybersecurity, teacher pipelines, interoperability. That is enough to start a quarterly monitor. It is not enough to claim a policy-movement trend.
37 states with published statewide guidance. Mean implementation signal 3.56. 0 classification or score changes from June to August.
18 bell-to-bell models, 19 instructional-time models. 0 model changes across the same 50 states.
Added after June: microschools, esports, cybersecurity, teacher pipelines, interoperability. Cybersecurity has 12 verified floors and 39 still marked not yet verified. Interoperability is a first-release coverage signal from the August 2026 scan: Project Unicorn plus ECS 2024, not a movement trend. Teacher-pipeline and microschool status exist, but most of those series have only one or two official monthly points.
This is a snapshot comparison, not a ranking and not a blended score. Not yet verified is a research gap. Washington, D.C. is shown on the dashboard as a comparison jurisdiction and is excluded from 50-state totals. Mid-month files stay in the month selector; this readout uses official YYYY-MM archives only.
A 50-state scan of intra-district, inter-district, capacity-posting, and transportation/funding rules. Kansas 2024-25 seats-if-capacity is the worked example. Missing cells stay not yet verified.
Read the studyA 50-state scan of education data standards, longitudinal systems, governance, and the missing operating layer.
Read the studyA first-release Super Snoopy scan of K-12 computer science policy, opened against statutes where we could, and started in Wichita at Spaght Code to the Future and HACK.
Read the studyA primary-source-backed study of state teacher apprenticeships, classified-staff pathways, residencies, tuition support, outcomes, and Wichita's local pipeline.
Read the studyA 51-jurisdiction scan of binding school-district cybersecurity duties, incident reporting, shared services, grants, ransomware rules, and framework alignment.
Read the studyA source-backed 51-jurisdiction dashboard separating esports participation, state-association status, leagues, and instructional pathways, with a detailed Wichita Public Schools case study.
Read the studyA 50-state fiscal scan of vouchers, education savings accounts, and tax-credit scholarships, focused on budget exposure, revenue loss, and transparent accounting.
Read the studyA 50-state scan of the policy pathways that shape how microschools can operate, use facilities, and connect to family funding.
Read the studyA visual 50-state scan of K-12 AI policy, showing how states are moving from voluntary guidance to enforceable district governance.
Read the studyA 50-state scan of K-12 personal device policy, with special attention to elementary and K-8 implications for district leaders.
Read the study